Missouri's senior senator, Democrat Claire McCaskill, who you'll have the chance to vote out of office next November, recently admitted to improperly billing taxpayers for use of an airplane that she owned on political trips not government business.
Now it turns out that McCaskill - a former auditor - failed to pay $287,000.00 in personal property taxes on that very same plane. (Link to story here.)
Is Claire a crook? Or, best case scenario, she just can't keep track of "minor" things like taxes she owes. After all, $287,000.00 is just pocket change for McCaskill.
Either way, does she really deserve to keep her job representing our state in Washington?
Showing posts with label Missouri Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Missouri Politics. Show all posts
Monday, March 21, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
Too Bad
Jim Talent, our state's one-time U.S. senator, won't be our state's next U.S. senator. (Link to story here.) And that's unfortunate. Talent would be the best person for the job. He has the experience, integrity, and conservative credentials to, again, be a great senator. He is a man of honesty and integrity. He is a man of intelligence ant thoughtfulness. In fact, he's probably too intelligent and thoughtful for Congress.
While Talent would have been the best candidate to replace current senator Claire McCaskill, McCaskill should not rest too easy. This is a reddish state already and one can sense the hue darkening. Several formidable Republicans are ready to enter the GOP primary for a crack at McCaskill in 2012 - a year that Republicans statewide and nationwide are fired up and ready to take back the majority in the Senate and to take back the White House. Ann Wagner, Sam Graves, Jo Ann Emerson, and Ed Martin have been mentioned. And Sarah Steelman has already thrown her hat in the ring. Just about the only Missouri Republican whose name hasn't been mentioned as a potential challenger for McCaskill is Brock Olivo. But give him time.
When the crowded Republican primary heats up in Missouri, let's hope that it remains civil. All of the GOP candidates should keep their eyes fixed on the true opposition in the race - McCaskill, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, and the Democrats . . . not each other. Keep in mind, all of you, that you agree on much more than you disagree. Don't get personal and wound the winner so badly that he or she can't manage to win in the end.
As for Talent, I don't think he'll be getting bored without a race to run. In addition to his other jobs and interests, it looks like he'll be keeping busy with the as-yet-unofficial Mitt Romney campaign for president. Good luck to you Jim - or should I say Secretary Talent?
While Talent would have been the best candidate to replace current senator Claire McCaskill, McCaskill should not rest too easy. This is a reddish state already and one can sense the hue darkening. Several formidable Republicans are ready to enter the GOP primary for a crack at McCaskill in 2012 - a year that Republicans statewide and nationwide are fired up and ready to take back the majority in the Senate and to take back the White House. Ann Wagner, Sam Graves, Jo Ann Emerson, and Ed Martin have been mentioned. And Sarah Steelman has already thrown her hat in the ring. Just about the only Missouri Republican whose name hasn't been mentioned as a potential challenger for McCaskill is Brock Olivo. But give him time.
When the crowded Republican primary heats up in Missouri, let's hope that it remains civil. All of the GOP candidates should keep their eyes fixed on the true opposition in the race - McCaskill, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, and the Democrats . . . not each other. Keep in mind, all of you, that you agree on much more than you disagree. Don't get personal and wound the winner so badly that he or she can't manage to win in the end.
As for Talent, I don't think he'll be getting bored without a race to run. In addition to his other jobs and interests, it looks like he'll be keeping busy with the as-yet-unofficial Mitt Romney campaign for president. Good luck to you Jim - or should I say Secretary Talent?
Labels:
Missouri Politics
Monday, November 22, 2010
Election Reflections . . . belated edition
Well, it has become clear for all to see - including me - that anyone depending on a regular blog fix should look elsewhere. However, if you want to read something good once in a while, stay tuned. I promise not to go away (Lord willing and the creek don't rise) without telling you all that I'm gone.So here we go, belatedly, with SLC's reflections on the November elections. I haven't been so happy with an election result since 1994. This was, of course, an even bigger victory. (Though I must admit that my mood was even better in 1994 for two reasons . . . that one came as more of a surprise but, more importantly, it was because I heard the results on CNN while on vacation in Spain.)
In January, Republicans will take a decisive majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and a significant minority in the Senate. In the Missouri General Assembly, the GOP has an overwhelming numbers advantage.
It is time to lay the the groundwork both in our state and nationally but anyone who wants real change needs to take a look at the Governor's Mansion in Jefferson City and the White House. There are still significant stumbling blocks in the persons of Jay Nixon and Barack Obama. Keep 2012 in your sights.
In the meantime, Roy Blunt and the other Republicans given our trust and sent to Washington have to draw a line on spending. The government must realize that we're broke and start cutting the budget in real ways. It won't be easy but it must be done. If the Democrats won't go along, that's their choice. Let them defend a government shutdown caused by their insistence on borrowing more money and adding it to our children's and grandchildren's tab, or printing it and devaluing the dollar.
Republicans in Washington must also target Obamacare. All of it. Repeal the monstrosity. Only then will we be in a position to negotiate substantial but incremental, reasoned, and conservative changes to America's healthcare system. Changes that would improve the private system rather than scrap it entirely and replace it with a Socialist single-payer government behemoth. A repeal of Obamacare should be the first one passed by the new House. And its repeal should be tacked onto other bills sent to the president's desk. Again . . . and again . . . and again. Let Obama be responsible for veto after veto if he must.
The Jeff City Republicans have a chance to make a real difference too. I heard Arthur Laffer on KMOX a while back, talking about a proposal to repeal Missouri's income tax in favor of a new, and surprisingly low, sales tax (coupled with refunds to cover the tax on purchase of necessities). Slashing income taxes would likely draw business like pigs on . . . well, you know.
And, I read in Sunday's St. Louis Post-Dispatch about another pro-Missouri jobs measure that will be pushed by GOP in the General Assembly . . . the Right to Work. Simply put, passing a Right to Work bill would prevent labor unions from automatically deducting or taking (some might say stealing) money from non-members paychecks and workplaces covered by union contracts. It sure seems like a good idea to me.
So, here's to the GOP for the next two years and beyond. Push the agenda to save America and build Missouri. If you can't get everything you want, get what you can. But don't settle. 2012 is not too far away.
Labels:
Economics,
Healthcare,
Missouri Politics,
National Politics,
Taxes,
The Blog
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Congratulations!
![]() |
| Senator-elect Roy Blunt Missouri |
![]() |
| Senator-elect Rand Paul Kentucky |
![]() |
| Senator-elect Marco Rubio Florida |
![]() |
| Senator-elect Ron Johnson Wisconsin |
Labels:
Missouri Politics,
National Politics
Monday, November 1, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
"Clear Frontrunner"
After months of campaigning, Roy Blunt remains "the clear frontrunner" in Missouri's race for the U.S. Senate. In fact, according to the latest poll from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and KMOV, Blunt's lead is extending. (Link to P.D. story here.)
Only eight days to go until the biggest, most-important mid-term election in the nation's history. Let's hope November 2, 2010, is the day America pulls back from the brink of Euro-style Socialism.
Keep the pressure on Roy!
Only eight days to go until the biggest, most-important mid-term election in the nation's history. Let's hope November 2, 2010, is the day America pulls back from the brink of Euro-style Socialism.
Keep the pressure on Roy!
Labels:
Missouri Politics,
National Politics
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Why is Roy Blunt smiling?
Because according to the latest poll (this one from CNN and Time Magazine) he's beating Robin Carnahan by 13 points.
Labels:
Missouri Politics
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Fox News Poll Shows Blunt by 8
Despite Robin Carnahan's efforts (if standing in a cow pen and propping up cardboard cutouts of her opponent, Barack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi can be considered "efforts"), Roy Blunt has a commanding 8 point lead in the latest poll from Fox News.
That's the headline. And it is great news. But there is even better news in the poll results. Missouri is breaking conservative!
58% of Missourians disapprove of Obama's performance as president (and 53% believe that Carnahan agrees with Obama too often).
A whopping 40% are "angry" about "the way the federal government is working." Another 29% are "dissatisfied."
58% (again) want Obamacare repealed (while only 35% want to keep it in place).
And 51% of Missourians "support the Tea Party movement."
If this is what big media considers a "battleground" state, it is going to be a great November.
That's the headline. And it is great news. But there is even better news in the poll results. Missouri is breaking conservative!
58% of Missourians disapprove of Obama's performance as president (and 53% believe that Carnahan agrees with Obama too often).
A whopping 40% are "angry" about "the way the federal government is working." Another 29% are "dissatisfied."
58% (again) want Obamacare repealed (while only 35% want to keep it in place).
And 51% of Missourians "support the Tea Party movement."
If this is what big media considers a "battleground" state, it is going to be a great November.
Labels:
Healthcare,
Missouri Politics,
National Politics
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
stltoday.com covering for Robin Carnahan?
Here's a link to the story. Note that the story covers a blunder by the Missouri Secretary of State and the headline correctly lambasts the "error." But, just who is the blundering, error-prone Secretary of State? Don't look to the story, the answer isn't in there. It is Robin Carnahan . . . the Democrat's candidate for U.S. Senate. stltoday.com and its parent, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, apparently don't want to call attention to that fact . . . but I will . . .
Robin Carnahan's office made "a counting error" and "nearly left a qualified independent candidate for State Senate off the November ballot."
Robin Carnahan's office made "a counting error" and "nearly left a qualified independent candidate for State Senate off the November ballot."
Labels:
Media,
Missouri News,
Missouri Politics
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Not-so-shockingly, Post-Dispatch editorial is way off base
I rarely read the local newspaper's editorial page. Why bother? I suspect that most St. Louisans could predict the Post-Dispatch's editorial position quite easily by reviewing the daily talking points from the Democratic National Committee and leaning a bit to the left. However, for some reason, today's lead editorial, which was headlined "President Pariah" caught my eye.
This editorial criticises Robin Carnahan for keeping her distance from Barack Obama and his policy "achievements" and advocates embracing the president's policies. No surprise there, and nothing really remarkable. But the piece continues and argues that "Ms. Carnahan . . . should be hammering on the fact that today's economic woes, record deficits, and record income disparity between the rich and the rest of America are in large part a function of decisions made on the Republicans' watch over the last 10 years: $2.1 trillion in tax cuts, a trillion dollars worth of wars conducted off the books and $373 billion in unfunded Medicare expansion."
This, of course, is right out of the old Democrat playbook . . . blame George W. Bush. And, you know what, I agree. President Bush and the Republicans spent too much when they were in power. True. No doubt about it. But lets take a look at the approximately $3.5 trillion in spending that the Post chooses to cite - not to discuss the merits of tax cuts, or the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, or the expansion of Medicare (which it would surprise me if the Post didn't endorse at the time) - but in comparison with the levels of spending since the Democrats have captured the White House.
The facts are this, from the time that George W. Bush took office in 2001 until he left in January of 2010, the national debt increased by $4,899,100,310,609. That's roughly $4.9 trillion. That's bad, no doubt about it, but President Bush was in office for eight years. Barack Obama has been in office for only 19 months. In those 19 months, the national debt has already increased by another $2,736,401,236,918. That's worse - and by a substantial margin.
During the Bush administration, the national debt increased at a rate of $1.68 billion per day. But in the first 579 days of the Obama administration, the national debt has increased at a rate of $4.73 billion per day. Almost $5 billion per day!
When it comes to government spending, the Democrats are Barry Bonds and the Republicans are Jack Clark. It is disingenuous for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch to criticize the spending record of George W. Bush and the Republican Party yet advocate embracing Obamaism.
I would give Robin Carnahan credit for running away from Obama if I believed that her run was anything more than a desperate and deceitful ploy in an election campaign. But, alas, that's exactly what it is.
This editorial criticises Robin Carnahan for keeping her distance from Barack Obama and his policy "achievements" and advocates embracing the president's policies. No surprise there, and nothing really remarkable. But the piece continues and argues that "Ms. Carnahan . . . should be hammering on the fact that today's economic woes, record deficits, and record income disparity between the rich and the rest of America are in large part a function of decisions made on the Republicans' watch over the last 10 years: $2.1 trillion in tax cuts, a trillion dollars worth of wars conducted off the books and $373 billion in unfunded Medicare expansion."
This, of course, is right out of the old Democrat playbook . . . blame George W. Bush. And, you know what, I agree. President Bush and the Republicans spent too much when they were in power. True. No doubt about it. But lets take a look at the approximately $3.5 trillion in spending that the Post chooses to cite - not to discuss the merits of tax cuts, or the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, or the expansion of Medicare (which it would surprise me if the Post didn't endorse at the time) - but in comparison with the levels of spending since the Democrats have captured the White House.
The facts are this, from the time that George W. Bush took office in 2001 until he left in January of 2010, the national debt increased by $4,899,100,310,609. That's roughly $4.9 trillion. That's bad, no doubt about it, but President Bush was in office for eight years. Barack Obama has been in office for only 19 months. In those 19 months, the national debt has already increased by another $2,736,401,236,918. That's worse - and by a substantial margin.
During the Bush administration, the national debt increased at a rate of $1.68 billion per day. But in the first 579 days of the Obama administration, the national debt has increased at a rate of $4.73 billion per day. Almost $5 billion per day!
When it comes to government spending, the Democrats are Barry Bonds and the Republicans are Jack Clark. It is disingenuous for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch to criticize the spending record of George W. Bush and the Republican Party yet advocate embracing Obamaism.
I would give Robin Carnahan credit for running away from Obama if I believed that her run was anything more than a desperate and deceitful ploy in an election campaign. But, alas, that's exactly what it is.
Labels:
Media,
Missouri Politics
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Blunt's lead widening
Check out the latest Rasmussen poll showing Roy Blunt leading Robin Carnahan in Missouri's Senate race by 11 percentage points, 51-40.
Don't get complacent folks, but the wheels seem to be falling off the Carnahan bandwagon.
Don't get complacent folks, but the wheels seem to be falling off the Carnahan bandwagon.
Labels:
Missouri Politics
Monday, August 23, 2010
Robin who?
Powerful national Democrats were in St. Louis this weekend. Robin Carnahan appeared with none of them. (The photo above is from 2009.)
And when those powerful Democrats spoke, in Missouri, where Carnahan is involved in a hot and extremely important U.S. Senate race, none of them mentioned her name. Not Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, not DNC chairman Tim Kaine, not Vice President Joe Biden. (Tony Messenger noticed . . . link here .)
Why not? Because Robin Carnahan is pretending that she's not like Sebelius, or Kaine, or Biden, or their leader, Barack Obama. It is an illusion. Let's not be fooled. Robin Carnahan is a rubber stamp waiting to happen. Whether she appears with the liberal Democrats of Washington or not . . . she's one of them.
And when those powerful Democrats spoke, in Missouri, where Carnahan is involved in a hot and extremely important U.S. Senate race, none of them mentioned her name. Not Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, not DNC chairman Tim Kaine, not Vice President Joe Biden. (Tony Messenger noticed . . . link here .)
Why not? Because Robin Carnahan is pretending that she's not like Sebelius, or Kaine, or Biden, or their leader, Barack Obama. It is an illusion. Let's not be fooled. Robin Carnahan is a rubber stamp waiting to happen. Whether she appears with the liberal Democrats of Washington or not . . . she's one of them.
Labels:
Missouri Politics,
National Politics
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Happy Birthday Barack and Robin!
Did you know today was Barack Obama's birthday? And Robin Carnahan's? Both are 49 years old today.
With only the best of intentions (and not to not-so-subtly highlight that Obama and Carnahan are two peas in the same pod), the Missouri Republican Party delivered a birthday cake to Robin Carnahan's Clayton office today. (As reported by Jake Wagman at stltoday.com - link here.)
With only the best of intentions (and not to not-so-subtly highlight that Obama and Carnahan are two peas in the same pod), the Missouri Republican Party delivered a birthday cake to Robin Carnahan's Clayton office today. (As reported by Jake Wagman at stltoday.com - link here.)
Labels:
Humor,
Missouri Politics,
National Politics
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Proposition C . . . a message to Barack Obama and the Democrats
Missouri's Proposition C, purportedly allowing Missourians to "opt out" of Obamacare's mandatory healthcare coverage provisions, is passing with overwhelming numbers. (Link here.)Legally, that probably won't matter as federal law will preempt the new state law but that wasn't the point of Proposition C. The point was to send a clear message to the advocates of the Democrats' healthcare "reform" package that was wheeled, dealed, and lied into law earlier this year. Consider the message sent.
But, unfortunately, I doubt that the intended audience is listening. How long has it been since the Democrats in Washington gave a [darn] about what us common folk out in the country thought? Have they ever? I don't see much evidence that Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi or their ilk are very concerned about what we think.
I am curious to see if the message gets through closer to home. What will the Democrats' newly-minted nominee for the U.S. Senate say about Obamacare now that the voters she's courting have spoken with such a loud voice?
I'm curious but that's about all. Robin Carnahan is an Obamite, through and through. Whatever she says now, she'll be saying to get elected. If elected, she'll be a rubber stamp for the Obama agenda. (For fun, check out this link.)
Seriously, the elections this November matter - a great deal. Missouri needs Roy Blunt. America needs Roy Blunt.
I can't say it enough. And I'll be saying it often for the next three months.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Not a happy Sunday for Robin Carnahan
Why not?
The top of the page, very bold headline in the very Pro-Carnahan St. Louis Post-Dispatch read: "POLL SHOWS BLUNT IN LEAD." (Link to story here - if the website is actually working.)
Now, of course, those of us paying attention have been reading that writing on the wall for some time now but it is great to see the liberal local newspaper confirming that Roy Blunt is up six points in the race for the United States Senate.
The Post is also reporting that in the same poll 57% of Missourians disapprove of Barack Obama's performance as president. That bodes well for Blunt (and Missouri). Only 37% approve of Obama's job performance.
Here's a not-so-subtle message to the 9% of Missouri voters who disapprove of Barack Obama's job performance but, apparently, aren't lined up behind Roy Blunt quite yet . . . Robin Carnahan would be vote in the back pocket of Barack Obama for remaining length of his presidency.
It is time to lend your support. Put on that Blunt bumper sticker. Donate if you can. Tell all your friends and get out to vote. The GOP needs the seat. And Missouri needs Roy Blunt.
The top of the page, very bold headline in the very Pro-Carnahan St. Louis Post-Dispatch read: "POLL SHOWS BLUNT IN LEAD." (Link to story here - if the website is actually working.)
Now, of course, those of us paying attention have been reading that writing on the wall for some time now but it is great to see the liberal local newspaper confirming that Roy Blunt is up six points in the race for the United States Senate.
The Post is also reporting that in the same poll 57% of Missourians disapprove of Barack Obama's performance as president. That bodes well for Blunt (and Missouri). Only 37% approve of Obama's job performance.
Here's a not-so-subtle message to the 9% of Missouri voters who disapprove of Barack Obama's job performance but, apparently, aren't lined up behind Roy Blunt quite yet . . . Robin Carnahan would be vote in the back pocket of Barack Obama for remaining length of his presidency.
It is time to lend your support. Put on that Blunt bumper sticker. Donate if you can. Tell all your friends and get out to vote. The GOP needs the seat. And Missouri needs Roy Blunt.
Labels:
Missouri Politics,
National Politics
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Why the left-leaning media hasn't said much about polls in Missouri's U.S. Senate race recently . . .
The above table from Real Clear Politics shows a pretty clear trend in Missouri voters from Democrat Robin Carnahan to Republican Roy Blunt. Shouldn't that be newsworthy? Where are the media reports?
Well, I suppose that goes without saying.
Well, I suppose that goes without saying.
Labels:
Media,
Missouri Politics
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
How's that "hope" and "change" working out for Macon, Missouri?
Barack Obama will be in Macon, Missouri, tomorrow. It will be a photo-op where the president pretends to be listening to real people from the rural community in the northeastern part of the state. Pretend, of course, is the key to that sentence. Roy Blunt is actually listening to real people from Macon. Here are a few of them:
It seems pretty clear that Obama's "hope" and "change" isn't helping Main Street as promised. In fact, it is hurting. Now isn't the time to send the liberals another vote in the U.S. Senate.
It seems pretty clear that Obama's "hope" and "change" isn't helping Main Street as promised. In fact, it is hurting. Now isn't the time to send the liberals another vote in the U.S. Senate.
Labels:
Missouri News,
Missouri Politics
Get your cameras ready
24th State has the scoop . . . Robin Carnahan has postponed a fundraising dinner to appear with Barack Obama when he visits Missouri on Wednesday.So, to anybody who plans to be in Macon for that appearance - get your cameras ready. Carnahan is usually pretty shy when Obama's in the area. Your snapshots could be rare and valuable. They will certainly be valuable to Roy Blunt's campaign for the U.S. Senate.
If anybody gets any good ones showing Carnahan and Obama together, e-mail them to me at stlouisconservative@gmail.com. I'll be happy to publicize them on this site.
Labels:
Missouri Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















