tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post6965466198944113655..comments2023-06-28T11:26:21.473-05:00Comments on Saint Louis Conservative: Democrats in Congress trying to intimidate Arizona Sheriff for enforcing immigration lawsSt. Louis Conservativehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18206343320261458781noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post-16447532912760198782009-03-18T22:38:00.000-05:002009-03-18T22:38:00.000-05:00While not one for isolationism, I think we're clos...While not one for isolationism, I think we're close to agreement Dameon.St. Louis Conservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18206343320261458781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post-45411441632098364082009-03-18T08:49:00.000-05:002009-03-18T08:49:00.000-05:00SLC, I agree with you there. However, constitutio...SLC, I agree with you there. <BR/><BR/>However, constitutionally, it is the National Guards job to protect the homeland. I believe there are safeguards in place that prevent federal troops from being "deployed" within the boarders of the United States, not that I necessarily agree with that.<BR/><BR/>If the NG was not deployed in foreign lands (where they shouldn't be), there would be plenty of man power for them to protect the borders.<BR/><BR/>If it were me, I'd pull them all home - go back to being isolationists. I'd ramp up to a 1M standing arm (which you could due through recruiting *if* they weren't being deployed in a war zone on foreign lands) and take a strickly defensive posture. The money being saved by not having troops deployed around the world could be used for the expansion and necessary equipment.<BR/><BR/>Rotate 200,000 men at a time on the Mexican boarder (that's about 50 foot of border per soldier) and the problem is solved. No more guns, drugs, or illigals crossing unhindered.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post-2244984020351156562009-03-16T23:24:00.000-05:002009-03-16T23:24:00.000-05:00National Guard? Why not go one step further . . ....National Guard? Why not go one step further . . . pull back some of the troops we station around the world for no particular reason and station them on the border?St. Louis Conservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18206343320261458781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post-51681511503173945012009-03-16T14:54:00.000-05:002009-03-16T14:54:00.000-05:00The blogger obviously knows nothing about immigrat...The blogger obviously knows nothing about immigration law...<BR/><BR/>nah, this is thuggery, plain and simple.thetimmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15876191646664989795noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post-46892132160397482552009-03-16T09:12:00.000-05:002009-03-16T09:12:00.000-05:00That's where are National Guard should be posted -...That's where are National Guard should be posted - shoulder to shoulder on the Mexican border.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456960610211818372.post-90628434342488730792009-03-14T22:00:00.000-05:002009-03-14T22:00:00.000-05:00I'm sure there wasn't a breach in the constitution...I'm sure there wasn't a breach in the constitution by this law abiding sherif. Good for him!! The constitution is for US citizens, not criminals from other countries. The Dems will do anything to get more votes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com